Neohygiene
                                             By: Dan Hall
                                              Excerpt From The Book

Do bacteria cause disease?  Do viruses?  What if I told you that they didn’t?  
Does HIV cause AIDS?  Do immunizations prevent disease?  Does Anthrax,
Ebola, E. Coli, the Hanta virus, Smallpox, Influenza, West Nile virus, or any
other so-called deadly pathogen cause sickness or pose any deadly threat
whatsoever?  

What if I said the answers to all of these questions was no?  What if I were to
tell you that no matter how many sick people you come in contact with, you
can’t catch disease?  Am I insane?  Crazy?  Nuts?  The truth is, we’ve all
been duped into believing a theory, the germ theory of disease that just isn’t
true.

We’ve all been tricked since birth into embracing the idea that when we are
around someone who is sick, we can also become sick; regardless of how
healthy we are at the time.  Call it what you will, brainwashing, hypnosis, or
whatever, this trickery runs so deep until we never notice all the times when
we are around sick people and we don’t catch their illnesses.  

We only remember the times when contagion appears to occur, and this only
strengthens our belief in disease transmission.  This belief, of course, is not
true.  We have been convinced of the existence of vampires and ghosts, and
now, more than any other time in history, we must open our eyes and stop
embracing the lies we are being told.  

Scientists since the late 1800s, including Louis Pasteur, have all been part of a
rather disorganized conspiracy to convince the public that the true cause of
disease is pesky germs.  Of course, there was no real conspiracy.  Medical
practitioners have also duped themselves into believing these deceptions just
as much as they’ve duped us into believing their irrational propaganda.  

The germ theory of disease came on the heels of the Middle Ages when
people believed that demons and evil spirits caused all diseases, so it wasn’t
that big of a transition to go from demons to microscopic bacteria.  

The belief in viruses came later, but they don’t cause disease, either.  Wait a
minute.  Am I saying that Ebola, HIV, and other viruses don’t cause disease?  
Am I saying that anthrax, pneumonia, and other diseases are not caused by
bacteria?  The answer to both questions is a resounding yes.

Viruses and bacteria cause disease about as much as trees cause the wind to
blow.  It might look like this is the case, and that’s why scientists have duped
themselves into believing such a fallacy, but in truth, health is caused by
healthy living.  

I can’t transmit my bad health any more than I can transmit my good health.  
It’s easy to blame germs, but what we should be doing is blaming ourselves
when we get sick.  We’re responsible, and that’s something a lot of people
just don’t want to hear.  

I know what I’ve said so far is pretty hard to swallow.  After all,
you’ve believed all of your life that diseases are caused by bacteria and
viruses.  You’ve believed that the common cold is contagious, that the flu can
only be prevented by vaccination, and that Ebola, AIDS, anthrax, and other
dreaded diseases are highly lethal and to be avoided at all costs.  

But you’ve been tricked into believing all of these myths by a medical
establishment that has been built upon the shaky foundation of the germ
theory of disease.  

Combine this with the fact that the business of medicine is just that, a
business, and a rather large and profitable one, to say the least-there’s no
mystery as to how an entire establishment of medical practitioners could fall
prey to the same deceptions they have used to deceive us into believing in
their scare tactics and lies.  

It wasn’t that long ago that a guy by the name of Louis Pasteur convinced an
entire nation and eventually, the entire world to believe in his germ theory.  
Most people think of Pasteur as the guy who invented pasteurization, but he
was responsible for so much more.  

Men like Pasteur, Edward Jenner, and Robert Koch are among those
responsible for the perpetuation of both the germ theory of disease and the
theory of immunization, two ideas that have set the foundation for the vast
majority of today’s medical establishment.  

With so much resting on the backs of these two outdated theories, it is
interesting to note that they are rarely tested under strict scientific scrutiny;
instead, they are often times believed to be true without question, making the
belief in the medical model more a religion than a science.

What’s worse, the germ theory of disease as well as the theory of
immunization are both outdated, erroneous, and unnecessary in today’s
world.  Both ideas were even questioned and opposed at their inception, but
dissension fell on deaf ears.  

The truth is quite the opposite from all you have ever learned, and slowly but
surely, the truth is making itself known, truths such as the AIDS hoax, the lie
of childhood immunization, and most importantly, the myth of contagion.  

In case you’re wondering, I am not a medical doctor, nor do I insult myself by
claiming to be one.  My advice comes from years of experience and
knowledge, but no claims are made that this advice is based upon so-called
clear medical evidence as would be embodied in the writings of a person with
a medical degree or license.  

I do not claim to be an authority on curative medicine, but as you will soon
realize, prevention is the key to health; however, there are times when you
should visit your doctor.  As aforementioned, if you have a medical
emergency, you are encouraged to consult a physician.  

Many years ago, I was like most people in America: overweight, unhealthy,
and completely ignorant of how to live disease-free.  I had a grandfather who
died of lung cancer, a mother who developed chronic fatigue syndrome and
diabetes, a grandmother with emphysema and arthritis, an alcoholic father,
and numerous other family members and friends with a variety of health
problems.

When I would develop cold or flu symptoms, they would last for weeks at a
time, and no matter which medicines I took or doctors I visited, my wellness
was on a steady decline.  I suffered from severe stomach cramps, had canker
sores on a regular basis, and it was very rare for me to go a single day without
mild aches and pains throughout my body.

When I sought the help of doctors, they rarely did anything but medicate,
medicate, medicate.  Sometimes, I was given prescription medications from
relatives who were just too lazy to take me to the doctor.  My health waned
because of these so-called standard medical procedures.  Unfortunately for
me, this type of health is what most people consider typical.  

Most people expect to be in ill health, and they fully believe that whatever their
doctor tells them, it has to be true!  What I now consider to be poor health is
actually considered normal health by the medical establishment, because with
the current medical model being based upon the germ theory of disease,
medical practitioners must assume that if only germs cause illnesses, then
illnesses can only be cured by medical means and rarely prevented.  

This type of thinking has duped our entire mainstream world into adhering to
ideas that have put our collective and individual health in jeopardy.  We go
through life fearing bacteria and viruses, things we cannot see and we trust
the opinions of people we do not know without ever questioning what they
have told us to believe.

We strictly adhere to the idea that the symptoms of disease mean that there is
something wrong with the body, and we are quick to go to the doctor or
pharmacist to get medications to relieve our symptoms without ever
wondering what caused the symptoms in the first place.

Did you know that over 100,000 people each year die of properly used
prescription medications?  But because the media, the medical establishment,
and most people are under the impression that prescription medications are
both good and necessary, we rarely hear of these deaths.

Regardless, adverse reactions to prescription medications are high, but
instead of hearing about these deaths on the nightly news, we hear about
Anthrax, the West Nile Virus, and other such diseases that take as many as a
whopping few dozen lives per year!  

More people die each year of Fluoride poisoning from drinking tap water.  
More people die each year from routine vaccinations.  But we don’t hear
about these deaths.  They aren’t sensational enough, not to mention the fact
that if we were privy to such information, many medical industries would fail in
their attempts to medicate the entire globe.  And that’s not good for business.

You might think you’re in good hands with your friendly neighborhood
physician, but what you have probably never realized is that the sole purpose
of the medical establishment is medicine.  It would be called the preventive
establishment if its purpose was to prevent disease, but medicine, by its very
design, is curative, not preventive.

You take medications to relieve symptoms.  With the exception of the
occasional routine check-up, doctors rarely see patients before they are sick,
and what’s sad is that when they do, the patients are often sent home with a
clean bill of physical health and a mental diagnosis of being a hypochondriac.

We have been taught to go to doctors when we’re sick.  We have been taught
that sickness is caused by germs; therefore, prevention doesn’t matter.

Health is a product of healthy living; something the medical elite rarely tells
anyone.  It’s not that doctors and other practitioners aren’t aware of the keys
to healthy living; they are merely tied to the belief that no matter how healthy
you are, pathogenic germs such as Ebola, E. Coli, HIV, Anthrax, and others
can and will cause damage if not treated with drugs and other
pharmaceuticals.  

In fact, nutrition is often overlooked in medical school, usually being offered
only as an elective.  Medical school students are far more fascinated with how
to cure the body than they are with how to prevent disease.

In today’s world, disease prevention has actually become synonymous with
wiping out disease, and this remains a curative approach.  The simple truth is
that most medical practitioners have been duped into believing the same
mistruths they dupe us into believing, all because the majority of the medical
establishment or medical theocracy is founded upon a vicious lie known as
the germ theory of disease.  

The belief that disease transmission or contagion actually occurs has
practically destroyed our sense of healthy living.  Simply put, we are so
convinced that sickness is caused by germs in our environment; most of us
fail to take the necessary steps to live healthy lives.  

If germs cause disease, then what’s the point?  Let’s just go ahead and drink,
smoke, use drugs, eat foods we shouldn’t eat, and for all intents and
purposes destroy our bodies from the inside out.  After all, we’re going to die
anyway.  Right?  Right?  Maybe not …

For over a hundred years, the world has believed in a medical model that just
isn’t true.  Sadly, this model has caused more illnesses than could ever be
blamed on so-called pathogenic germs.  

Let’s take childhood vaccinations for starters.  If there was a cornerstone to
medical disease prevention, childhood vaccinations would be it.  Of course,
this is a long way from true disease prevention, but again, the word
“prevention” no longer means what it should.  

The basic premise behind most childhood immunizations is to pump a tiny
amount of pathogenic material into a child’s bloodstream in order to trigger
an immune response.  

Supposedly, antibodies are created by the child’s immune system, and these
antibodies will attack any invading pathogens later in life.  Immunity is said to
last a lifetime; however, booster shots are often necessary.  That aside, the
vaccination theory falls flat on its face when put to the test.

A few years ago, the entire world was shocked to learn about the link between
autism and the MMR vaccine.  What the news media failed to tell you is that
this type of research into the dangers of vaccines is nothing new.  

Not only has the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine been linked to
behavioral disorders such as autism, but MMR has also been linked to
diabetes, lung cancer, epilepsy, and numerous other disorders up to and
including death.   

During the latter part of the 20th century, shaken baby syndrome became a
household term when many parents were arrested and charged with the
crime of killing their newborn children in violent attempts to get them to stop
crying and go back to sleep.  

It was later determined by competent law enforcement researchers that many
of these children died of crib death also known as sudden infant death
syndrome or SIDS and that their parents were falsely accused.

But, to this day, the medical establishment remains puzzled as to the true
cause of crib death.  At least, that’s what we are told by the popular media.  
Many doctors have actually come forth with shocking evidence that the DPT
vaccine, particularly the pertussis portion of this vaccine, was the cause of
most crib deaths.  It was also determined that the DPT vaccine could create
the same physical damages found in victims of shaken baby syndrome.

Interestingly, the American Medical Association studied the particulars of
SIDS and incorrectly advised parents to change the sleeping positions of their
infants.  It was argued that suffocation was being caused by babies sleeping
on their stomachs, but numerous later studies have failed to duplicate the
AMAs faulty research.  

It is quite clear that the culprit here is the DPT shot, which is actually
responsible for more than 10,000 deaths per year by the medical
establishment’s own estimates.  If that weren’t enough, vaccines are
responsible for an array of diseases and disorders.  Both MMR and DPT
contain neurotoxins, which can lead to brain damage, nervous system
malfunction, and death.  They have been linked to anaphylactic shock,
arthritis, Alzheimer’s disease, and even cancer.  

Hold on a second.  Vaccines are supposed to prevent disease.  Right?  
Wrong.  Vaccines, by their very design, are hazardous to our health.  The
premise is to create immunity, but if germs don’t cause disease, then
immunity just doesn’t exist.  

Our bodies can’t fight something that isn’t there, so instead of creating
specialized white blood cells known as antibodies when vaccines are
pumped directly into our bloodstreams, our bodies go into defensive mode
against the vaccines!  

If our bodies are too weak to fight off the poisons that have been injected
directly into our bloodstreams, then we can easily become sick due to the
toxins found within the vaccines.  And what toxins might those be?  Well, I’m
glad you asked.

The MMR vaccine contains antibiotics and bacterial waste, both of which are
harmful to cells.  The shot for polio contains formaldehyde, aluminum,
mercury, and antibiotics.  The toxins in the chicken pox vaccine can lead to
fever, aches and pains, and death.  

DPT can lead to brachial neuritis and various allergic reactions such as death,
and DPT also contains aluminum and mercury.  Many vaccines are cultured in
the cells of chicken embryos, and the rubella strain of the MMR is actually
cultured in cells taken from aborted human fetuses.  And despite what
doctors tell us, we all know the flu vaccine causes symptoms of the flu.

For years, vaccine manufacturers received thousands of complaints of
adverse reactions such as death, many of which were taken to court.  Quite a
few of these lawsuits dealt with mental retardation, sudden infant death
syndrome, handicap, and death, and most resulted in the jury ordering the
vaccine manufacturers to pay large settlements to the victims and their
families.

A large portion of the fee paid for routine vaccinations actually went into
lawsuit funds to help pay settlements.  Many of these lawsuits were even
settled out of court in attempts to keep the matters hush-hush.  Now, victims
of routine immunizations are no longer allowed to sue huge vaccine
manufacturers; instead, they must file their claims with government
organizations such as the NVICP, which, so far, has paid out over a billion
dollars to victims and their families.

Regardless, is any vaccine safe?  During the 1930s and 1940s, when the
majority of all mass-immunization programs took place in America and
throughout the world, the occurrences of many of the diseases vaccinated
against did decline, but what is rarely reported is that the decline of most
diseases actually began prior to the introduction of their vaccines.

Also, in countries like England where vaccinations were not widely used, the
same diseases declined due to overall better living conditions, nutrition,
sanitation, and hygiene.  In countries like Japan and America where mass-
immunization programs were embraced, incidents of some diseases actually
skyrocketed.

The horrific swine flu pandemic of 1920 that killed almost 20 million people
worldwide actually coincided with a mass-immunization campaign.  A similar
campaign was cut short in the 1970s for fear of another pandemic, but no one
ever fully placed the blame on the vaccine.  Regardless, it is quite obvious that
so many deaths were due to the medical establishment’s so-called
“preventive” measures.

Many diseases that were said to disappear due to vaccinations were actually
reclassified and never truly declined.  Smallpox was said to be eradicated, but
the symptoms for many other childhood illnesses (chicken pox, measles, and
mumps to name a few) are almost identical to those of smallpox, which
suggests medical reclassification, changing the name of one disease to
another in order to say that the one disease was wiped out by a vaccine
while another disease arose.  Pretty clever, huh?  

The blunt truth is that no vaccine has ever eradicated any disease.  No
vaccine is either effective or safe.  They are all deadly, putrid poisons that
should never be injected directly into our bloodstreams, thus bypassing
Nature’s best defense against disease: the skin.  

What’s really troubling is the blatant contradictions the medical establishment
is willing to propose as truth, all the while expecting us to whistle a comical
tune while believing everything they say.  

Supposedly, inoculations work on the premise that our bodies will create
antibodies to the pathogens found within the vaccines.  If we have antibodies,
we are immune to the particular disease in question.  If we are immune, we
can’t catch disease.  

This sounds very neat and tidy on the surface, but what about AIDS?  With
most other diseases, if you have the antibodies to that disease, you cannot
catch the disease-you are immune to the disease but with AIDS, if you have
the antibodies to HIV, you are said to be HIV positive and at risk for AIDS.  
This is also the case with many other viral diseases, such as rabies.  

Since no one can culture a virus (which is a blatant violation of Koch’s
postulates, one of the cornerstones of the contagion theory), the only way to
detect a virus is to detect its antibodies.  But if we have antibodies, we’re
immune.  

That’s the whole premise of immunization.  So, on the one hand, if you have
antibodies, you have immunity, but on the other hand, if you have antibodies,
you are at risk.  I have never heard so much idiocy in my life.  This is just one
of those little cracks in the medical model that should make anyone question
both the germ theory of disease and the theory of medicine altogether.  

Medical researchers and practitioners want to have their cake and eat it, too.  
With so many hands in the proverbial pot, there’re too many people who just
don’t know what’s going on and too many people who think they’re holier-
than-thou and incapable of making mistakes.  

So, when mistakes are made, the know-nothings remain ignorant, and the
holier-than-thous assume that everything’s going as planned.  All the while,
the entire foundation upon which everything in medicine is based continues
to crumble underneath their feet.  

In time, the entire establishment will crumble, the theocracy will fall and
perhaps healthy living will take a stand at the front for a change.  

When people are diagnosed HIV positive (a diagnosis that could happen to
anyone due to the faultiness of the HIV test), the fear factor alone is enough to
cause disease.  Mind over body is a very powerful phenomenon, but I won’t
get into that right now.  

Assuming your emotions don’t get the best of you if and when you are
diagnosed positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (and even if they
do), most doctors are going to start you out on a strict daily regimen of AIDS
drugs.  

Often called the
“AIDS Cocktail” this regimen can consist of taking up to 40
pills per day for the rest of your life.  One of the most common AIDS drugs is
AZT, which is a very deadly drug in and of itself and is actually capable of
creating the same symptoms associated with AIDS.   

Symptoms such as blood cell destruction, chronic fatigue, lactic acidosis, and
even death can all be caused by the prolonged use of AZT.  Initially, AZT was
created as a cancer drug, long before anyone had ever heard of AIDS, but due
to its high toxicity, it was pulled by its manufacturer and shelved, never to be
used again.  

When AIDS became popular, AZT was put back into production.  The media
wants us to believe that AZT was specifically designed to combat HIV, thus
preventing the onset of full-blown AIDS, but this is a tremendous lie.  

AZT was created to cure cancer, and because it was so toxic, its use was
suppressed.  Now, it is used to treat AIDS, but the sad truth of this tale is that
AZT actually causes the symptoms associated with AIDS.  

In numerous clinical studies, AIDS patients who did not take AZT actually lived
longer and healthier lives than those who popped these deadly pills like
candy.  Like all other AIDS drugs, AZT is a notoriously harmful drug that will
kill you if taken over a prolonged period of time.  It doesn’t matter if you’re
going to develop AIDS or not.  If you test HIV positive and you’re put on AZT,
you will develop AIDS, and you will die.  

And remember what I said before: the test for HIV is faulty.  Due to how it is
tested and the chances of a false positive, almost anyone can test positive for
HIV.  

If you test positive, will you question the diagnosis and get a second, third,
and fourth opinion, or will you blindly follow the medical establishment and
take every drug they hand you in hopes that you won’t get sick?  

Of course, HIV doesn’t even exist.  The belief in viruses came about almost 40
years before the technology existed to see at the submicroscopic level using
an electron microscope.  

Any first-year molecular biology student will tell you that electron
microscopes are very poor instruments that produce black and white
shadows of images on computer printed electron micrographs that must be
interpreted by trained professionals before anyone knows what they are.  

When you look at an electron micrograph, it’s not like looking at a snapshot;
it’s like looking at black blobs on a white sheet of paper.  Unless you’re told
what you’re looking at, you have no idea what you’re seeing.  

News flash: Even the trained professionals were told what to look for at one
time, so who’s to say they even know what they’re seeing?  

Back in the 1940s (after over 35 years of believing that viruses must exist),
James Hillier manufactured the first usable transmission electron microscope,
one that could see at the submicroscopic level.  After studying the poor
electron micrographs they produced, scientists finally agreed that they had
found a virus.  

After all, the belief existed for almost 40 years; they would have looked pretty
stupid if they didn’t find something.  But did they really find viruses?  Or did
they just go on a modern-day witch hunt and accuse the first thing they saw
of being a witch … er, I mean, virus?  

You’ve got to know a little something about molecular biology to really
understand the argument against the existence of viruses.  
I’ll briefly explain what has happened, but don’t worry if you don’t fully
understand.  I doubt there’s more than a handful of molecular biologists who
fully understand everything they believe.  Like I said before, it’s more a
religion than a science.

Anyway, right now in your body, you have billions upon billions of cells,
muscle cells, tissue cells, blood cells, bone cells, and so forth.  All of these
cells work together to form you.  

But while you can live many, many years (perhaps a lot longer than you
currently believe), your cells only live for weeks or months at a time.  After
that, they undergo the process of cellular division.  One cell splits into two
cells, two into four, four into eight, etc.  Cells can only divide so many times
before they get kind of old, and then they die.  

Their progeny, of course, can go on forever.  But cells do die.  The process is
known as apoptosis, a kind of cellular suicide.  When this occurs to a cell, the
cell dissipates inside the bloodstream and becomes a rather sloppy blob of
genetic material and protein debris.  

Getting back to viruses, the definition for a virus is a genome wrapped in a
protein sheath.  A genome is nothing more than genetic material, so if a dead
cell is genetic material and protein debris, then wouldn’t it make sense that
these materials could be misidentified on occasion as viruses?  

A genome wrapped in a protein sheath could easily be a dead cell or a virus.  
During the 1940s, scientists did not know that cells died and dissipated in the
bloodstream. Instead of finding viruses, they found dead cells, and their witch-
hunt concluded with them believing that viruses were nonliving genomes
wrapped in protein sheaths.  

But scientists still believe in viruses.  Don’t they?  Sure they do, because as I
have already mentioned, the germ theory of disease is rarely put to the test,
and even when it is, any unwanted conclusions are written off as poor
research.  

The germ theory is, for all intents and purposes, written in stone.  It would be
blasphemous to go against such a steadfast belief.  But science still goes on.  
The medical establishment has learned about apoptosis, the death of a cell.  
And what’s interesting is that they have admitted on many occasions that
dead cells can be misidentified as viruses.

The two are so similar until it is difficult to tell them apart!  Could it then be
possible that a virus is nothing more than a dead cell?  

Concerning viruses, there is much more to the story.  Viruses are said to
invade living cells in order to force reproduction.  When living cells eat dead
cells (as they do all the time in the bloodstream), it could easily appear as
though a virus is entering into a living cell.  

When living cells eat, it is known as phagocytosis.  The process of
phagocytosis, then, has been misidentified as a virus entering a cell.  Keep in
mind that no one sees this process in live action.  It must all be interpreted on
a series of electron micrographs, which are computer printed shadows of
images on black and white paper.  

It takes experts to read these micrographs, and even the experts have
admitted that they have mistaken dead cells for viruses on many occasions.  
Couldn’t they have also mistaken phagocytosis for a virus entering into a
living cell?  

For what it’s worth, viruses do not cause disease.  They don’t even exist.  
Viral diseases such as smallpox, AIDS, HPS, the Flu, and even the common
cold are not caused by viruses, and are, therefore, not contagious.  

So, what causes smallpox?  Smallpox supposedly does not occur anymore,
because it was supposedly eradicated many years ago.  

Regardless, its symptoms are still around.  We call these symptoms by other
names now, such as chicken pox, German measles, etc.  But are these
symptoms really indicative of a disease?  

What you’ve got to understand is that the body, while complex by design, is
very simple in operation.  

When you take drugs, eat what you shouldn’t, drink, smoke, live without
regards to health, take routine vaccinations, and stifle your symptoms with
medications, your body has no choice but to find a way to get rid of all this
toxic stuff you’ve been pumping into it.  

So, when it needs to, your body forces a detoxification to eliminate all of the
toxins you have been consuming.  What you normally consider disease is
actually your body’s way of making you healthier.   

Children who are constant consumers of dairy products, who are given
medications to stifle their cold and flu symptoms, and who are pumped full of
toxic vaccinations a dozen times in their infancy are benefited by developing
the symptoms of chicken pox, the measles, and other childhood diseases.  

These diseases are used by their bodies to eliminate a few years’ worth of
built-up poisons.  Such diseases are actually very efficient, because the entire
surface of the skin is used to eliminate toxins.  

As we grow older, the body becomes less efficient, and diseases with pox-like
symptoms don’t occur very often.  Less efficiency is due to storage of too
many toxins.  

We are taught from a very early age that every time we have a slight cough or
an upset stomach, it’s okay to take the next best wonder drug to relieve
ourselves of these symptoms.  

Again, the body is very simple in operation.  If you put something into it that it
cannot use, your body immediately tries to get rid of it.  The more you put in,
the more your body tries to eliminate, but there are times when these toxins
are stored for too long.  

Usually, normal channels of elimination such as defecation, urination,
respiration, and perspiration are enough to eliminate all toxic substances
from the body, but when toxins are stored for prolonged periods of time, they
must be eliminated through alternate channels, and that is why you develop
symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, sweating due to high fever, nasal drip,
coughing, sneezing, pustules and boils, and so forth.  

All of these symptoms are liquid releasing in nature.  They serve the purpose
of eliminating poisons that have been stored in your body for a prolonged
period of time.  

Your body uses these alternate channels for the purposes of detoxification,
but as we have all been taught, what are you supposed to do when you
develop such symptoms?  You take medications to relieve yourself of these
symptoms.  

In essence, you stop the detoxification, which forces your body to restore the
toxins, thus setting you up for a harsher detoxification in the future.  

The older we get, the more toxins our bodies are forced to store.  Doctors
have got the whole premise backwards.  Liquid releasing symptoms are not
caused by bacteria and viruses.  They are not symptoms of a disease.  They
are symptoms of a detoxification, and the purpose of a detoxification is to take
something out of the body that does not belong there.  

Doctors who prescribe medications that stifle the detoxification are merely
stifling the body’s natural defense against disease.  We need to detoxify.  It is
a normal part of living, and if we stifle these symptoms, we force our bodies to
become inefficient, sluggish, and inoperative.

True diseases are caused by the storage of poisons.  AIDS, cancer, diabetes,
autoimmune disorders such as lupus, lymphocytopenia, lung failure, arthritis,
tuberculosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, aging, and
even death are all caused by the unnecessary storage of toxins in particular
areas of your body, thus leading to failure in those parts of your body.  

The storage of toxins in your pancreas can lead to diabetes; storage in your
joints can lead to arthritis; storage in your muscles and bones can lead to
fatigue.  This information might seem radical and shocking, but it is the
simplest explanation to disease symptoms, and in science, the most
parsimonious or simplest explanation of the data is always the best
explanation.  

The medical establishment has become overzealous and complicated in their
explanations for disease.  They want us to believe that there are thousands of
diseases with thousands of causes and thousands of cures.  

If they would just look at the body rationally, they would realize that it is a
simple, elegant machine capable of keeping itself healthy with the proper
nutrients, rest, love, and living conditions.  

Medical practitioners have become cold and impersonal, looking at the human
body as nothing more than a pile of blood and guts, never fully understanding
why it is alive and never fully understanding what disease is and how to
prevent it.  

The cold, hard truth is that the only cure for disease is the disease itself.  
When the body detoxifies, it is in the process of curing or healing itself, and
any interference of this process spells disaster.  

All medications serve to stifle symptoms.  All of them are neurotransmitter
inhibitors or accelerators capable of tampering with the proper neurological
functioning of the body.  

Tampering with this function causes malfunction within the body.  Cells are
forced to operate in ways they wouldn’t normally operate, the nervous system
is forced to shut down, and the body is changed dramatically.  

Liquid releasing symptoms are stifled for purposes of curing the disease, and
doctors never realize that these symptoms are the body’s way of healing
itself.  All medications are toxic to cells.  All medications, including
vaccinations and antibiotics, are toxic to the body and capable of destroying
the body from the inside out.  

Children who are forced to take Ritalin by so-called caring parents who
believe that their children have ADHD are very prone to developing tics,
mania, liver failure, allergies, and psychosis.  The side-effects of amoxicillin,
Cipro, and other antibiotics can include convulsions, psychosis, cellular
damage, joint and cartilage deterioration, etc.  

Psychoactive drugs such as Paxil, Prozac, and Zoloft are responsible for
causing more serious bouts of depression, some so severe they have led
users to murder their families and kill themselves.   

Over 100,000 people each year die of prescription medications they were told
to take by their doctors, and what’s scary, evidence suggests they were
taking the drugs the way they were supposed to be taken.  

Drugs, whether illegal, prescription, or over-the-counter, are, by their very
nature, dangerous to the human body and to the overall health and wellness
of anyone who takes them.  

Drugs are dangerous, and its time we stopped using them to cure diseases
that are not harmful to the body.  Again, doctors have got it backwards.  They
want us to believe that the diseases are bad and the drugs are good, but in
truth, it is the diseases that are good and necessary, while the drugs only
serve to stifle much needed symptoms, thus forcing the body to become more
diseased.  

So, viruses don’t cause disease, drugs are bad, vaccinations kill, and health
is a product of healthy living.  

What about bacteria?  Since the 1800s, bacteria have been getting a bad rap
from the medical community as being the primary pesky disease-causing
germs.  But, as I’ve already said, bacteria do not cause disease.  

Louis Pasteur acted pretty much by himself on this mistake.  He was asked by
the French government to find out why drinking fermented alcohol causes
people to get sick.  

Today, we all know that beer is quite capable of making us experience the
symptoms of a detoxification, but back then, back when many people still
believed that demons caused diseases and science was still crawling at a
rather slow pace no one knew about detoxifications and how alcohol affects
the body.  

Pasteur dutifully went to work to find out why alcohol makes people sick, and
the conclusion he drew was that the bacteria within the beer caused
sickness.  After all, when people are sick, bacteria can be found.  

This conclusion led to the premise of pasteurization, whereby liquids are
heated at extreme temperatures to destroy bacteria.  All of this is well and
good; however, there were quite a few scientists during Pasteur’s time who
did not agree with Pasteur, but because the French government believed
Pasteur, any opposition to his ideas fell on deaf ears.  

But just because his ideas were believed above all others and without
question, Pasteur’s conclusions were still incorrect.  

Bacteria are very simple, single-celled organisms.  Like most of earth’s simple
creatures, bacteria live for two very basic purposes: food and procreation.  
They procreate just like any other cell-through cellular division-which makes
them asexual.  And they are responsible for eating the dead debris left behind
when plants and animals die.

The word usually associated with the work of bacteria is
“decay.”  When
something is dead, it decays, and it is the job of bacteria to break down dead
tissue at the cellular level, thereby ridding the earth of dead plants and
animals.  

Without them, we’d be up to our armpits in cadavers.  All bacteria are
saprophytes.  This is what scientists call creatures that eat dead things.  
Fungi, many insects, vultures, and all strains of bacteria are saprophytes and
incapable of eating anything other than dead tissue.

If bacteria make us sick, then that means they must be eating our living tissue,
thus killing our cells and causing our bodies harm.  But as saprophytes,
bacteria cannot eat anything but dead tissue.  If you are alive, then your tissue
is living; therefore, bacteria cannot harm you.  Right?  Well, not quite.  

At all times, you have billions of bacteria living inside of your body.  
Remember, cells die all of the time. Typically, other cells are responsible for
gobbling up these cells and disposing them from the body.  

But bacteria are also within your body to help in the expulsion of dead cellular
debris.  You have bacteria in your throat, lungs, stomach, intestines, and all
throughout your bloodstream.  

They are there to help you digest food, they provide you with certain vitamins,
they help in the absorption of minerals, and they perform thousands of other
functions that you need for survival.  

Without bacteria, your body would be overwhelmed by dead cells, and you
would die.  The symbiotic relationship we have with thousands of strains of
bacteria is necessary for our survival, so it is ridiculous for us to think that
they can cause disease.  

The medical establishment has got the premise backwards.  Their assumption
is that bacteria devour living cells, thus causing tissue destruction, thus
causing disease.  But this is the complete opposite of what truly happens.  

Your body is very efficient, but it needs the proper nutrients in order to
function correctly.  When you avoid nutritious foods and pump your body full
of toxic substances such as beer, prescription medications, and vaccines,
your cells do not divide properly, your tissues and organs fail to function, and
your body falls into a downward spiral of ill health.  

Drugs kill cells.  Even over-the-counter drugs kill cells.  When you kill cells, the
bacteria that are already within your body, bacteria such as staph, TB, strep,
and thousands of other strains are obligated by natural design to devour
these dead cells.  

When you kill cells, bacteria devour these cells, because that’s what they do.  
When you throw out the trash, flies are attracted to the trash.  Did the flies
cause the trash to exist?  Does the presence of flies cause garbage?  No.  So,
does the presence of bacteria cause dead tissue cells?  No.  

The tissue cells must exist first.  By taking in toxins, you kill cells, and when
you destroy cells, bacteria are attracted to these diseased areas.  If you go to
the doctor and he finds bacteria, then it is automatically assumed you have a
bacterial infection, but the premise is backwards.  

Pasteur’s critics were never able to convince the mainstream that Pasteur
was wrong.  The medical establishment, which is most definitely a very
lucrative business, spilling over into pharmaceuticals, immunizations,
expensive and oftentimes unnecessary surgeries, extravagant hospitals, and
so forth, pressed on with the idea of the germ theory of disease without
question.  

Even after they learned of the toxicity of beer, thus disputing Pasteur’s
findings, they remained loyal to the germ theory, because it was the
foundation of the medical establishment back then just as it is today.  

Why?  Because the only way to cure bacterial and viral diseases is with
medications, and medications are huge sellers.  For starters, they’re legal
drugs.  Many people use them for recreational purposes when they are not
sick, and many doctors see nothing wrong with prescribing drugs for such
purposes.  

Secondly, medications are seen as quick fixes, and offering quick fixes is
much more profitable than offering advice on healthy living.  

Finally, medications are a source of residual income. People who use
medications keep coming back for more and more without ever questioning
the consequences.  

We have become comfortable with the idea of popping a pill to relieve
ourselves of pain, nausea, aches, and symptoms of so-called germ-related
diseases.  

The cold, hard truth is that viruses and bacteria do not cause disease.  Most
diseases are actually body initiated detoxifications for purposes of regaining
balance within the body, and it is when the symptoms of these diseases are
stifled that true sicknesses such as AIDS, cancer, and aging occur.  

The more the body is forced to store toxic substances within its cells, joints,
tissues, organs, and bones, the more the health of the body degrades, and
this is the true cause of disease.  

Health is only created by healthy living, and the medical establishment does
not offer the necessary tools you need to live healthily.  

By: Dan Hall

Article: Neohygiene,  Excerpt From The Book
www.rawschool.com/disease/