Vaccinations Deadly Immunity
                                                                   By: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
                                                                                    July 2009

                                                       
       When a study revealed that mercury
                                                        
      in childhood vaccines may have
                                                       
       caused autism in thousands of kids,
                                                       
       the government rushed to conceal the
                                                     
         data -- and to prevent parents from
                                                       
       suing drug companies for their role in
                                                       
       the epidemic.  

In June 2000, a group of top government scientists and health officials
gathered for a meeting at the isolated
Simpsonwood Conference Center in
Norcross, Ga.  

Convened by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the meeting
was held at this Methodist retreat center, nestled in wooded farmland next to
the Chattahoochee River, to ensure complete secrecy.  

The agency had issued no public announcement of the session -- only private
invitations to 52 attendees.  

There were high-level officials from the CDC and the
Food and Drug
Administration
, the top vaccine specialist from the World Health Organization
in Geneva, and representatives of every major vaccine manufacturer,
including
GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth and Aventis Pasteur.  

All of the scientific data under discussion, CDC officials repeatedly reminded
the participants, was strictly
"embargoed."  There would be no making
photocopies of documents, no taking papers with them when they left.  

The federal officials and industry representatives had assembled to discuss a
disturbing new study that raised alarming questions about the safety of a host
of common childhood vaccines administered to infants and young children.  

According to a CDC epidemiologist named Tom Verstraeten, who had
analyzed the agency's massive database containing the medical records of
100,000 children, a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines -
- Thimerosal
-- appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of
other neurological disorders among children.  

"I was actually stunned by what I saw" Verstraeten told those assembled at
Simpsonwood, citing the staggering number of earlier studies that indicate a
link between
Thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder,
hyperactivity and autism.  

Since 1991, when the CDC and the FDA had recommended that three
additional vaccines laced with the preservative
Thimerosal be given to
extremely young infants -- in one case, within hours of birth -- the estimated
number of cases of autism had increased fifteen fold, from one in every 2,500
children to one in 166 children.  

Even for scientists and doctors accustomed to confronting issues of life and
death, the findings were frightening.  

"You can play with this all you want" Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the
American Academy of Pediatrics, told the group.  The results "are statistically
significant."  

Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of
Colorado
whose grandson had been born early on the morning of the
meeting's first day, was even more alarmed.  

"My gut feeling?" he said.  "Forgive this personal comment -- I do not want my
grandson to get a Thimerosal-containing vaccine until we know better what is
going on."  

But instead of taking immediate steps to alert the public and rid the vaccine
supply of Thimerosal, the officials and executives at Simpsonwood spent
most of the next two days discussing how to cover up the damaging data.  

According to transcripts obtained under the
Freedom of Information Act,
many at the meeting were concerned about how the damaging revelations
about
Thimerosal would affect the vaccine industry's bottom line.  

"We are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits" said
Dr. Robert Brent, a pediatrician at the
Alfred I. Dupont Hospital for Children in
Delaware.
 "This will be a resource to our very busy plaintiff attorneys in this
country."  

Dr. Bob Chen, head of vaccine safety for the CDC, expressed relief that:
"given the sensitivity of the information, we have been able to keep it out of
the hands of, let's say, less responsible hands."  

Dr. John Clements, vaccines advisor at the World Health Organization,
declared that:
"perhaps this study should not have been done at all."  He
added that:
"the research results have to be handled" warning that the study
"will be taken by others and will be used in other ways beyond the control of
this group."  

In fact, the government has proved to be far more adept at handling the
damage than at protecting children's health.  

The CDC paid the
Institute of Medicine to conduct a new study to whitewash
the risks of
Thimerosal, ordering researchers to "rule out" the chemical's link
to autism.  

It withheld Verstraeten's findings, even though they had been slated for
immediate publication, and told other scientists that his original data had been
"lost" and could not be replicated.  

And to thwart the
Freedom of Information Act, it handed its giant database of
vaccine records over to a private company, declaring it off-limits to
researchers.  

By the time Verstraeten finally published his study in 2003, he had gone to
work for
GlaxoSmithKline and reworked his data to bury the link between
Thimerosal and autism.  

Vaccine manufacturers had already begun to phase
Thimerosal out of
injections given to American infants -- but they continued to sell off their
mercury-based supplies of vaccines until last year.  

The CDC and FDA gave them a hand, buying up the tainted vaccines for
export to developing countries and allowing drug companies to continue
using the preservative in some American vaccines -- including several
pediatric flu shots as well as tetanus boosters routinely given to 11-year-olds.  

The drug companies are also getting help from powerful lawmakers in
Washington.  Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, who has received $873,000 in
contributions from the pharmaceutical industry, has been working to
immunize vaccine makers from liability in 4,200 lawsuits that have been filed
by the parents of injured children.  

On five separate occasions, Frist has tried to seal all of the government's
vaccine-related documents -- including the Simpsonwood transcripts -- and
shield
Eli Lilly, the developer of Thimerosal, from subpoenas.  

In 2002, the day after Frist quietly slipped a rider known as the
"Eli Lilly
Protection Act"
into a homeland security bill, the company contributed
$10,000 to his campaign and bought 5,000 copies of his book on bioterrorism.
 

Congress repealed the measure in 2003 -- but earlier this year, Frist slipped
another provision into an anti-terrorism bill that would deny compensation to
children suffering from vaccine-related brain disorders.  

"The lawsuits are of such magnitude that they could put vaccine producers out
of business and limit our capacity to deal with a biological attack by terrorists,"
says Andy Olsen, a legislative assistant to Frist.  

Even many conservatives are shocked by the government's effort to cover up
the dangers of
Thimerosal.  

Rep. Dan Burton, a Republican from Indiana, oversaw a three-year
investigation of
Thimerosal after his grandson was diagnosed with autism.  
"Thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines is directly related to the autism
epidemic"
his House Government Reform Committee concluded in its final
report:

"This epidemic in all probability may have been prevented or curtailed had the
FDA not been asleep at the switch regarding a lack of safety data regarding
injected Thimerosal, a known neurotoxin."
 

The FDA and other public health agencies failed to act, the committee added,
out of
"institutional malfeasance for self protection" and "misplaced
protectionism of the pharmaceutical industry."  

The story of how government health agencies colluded with Big Pharma to
hide the risks of
Thimerosal from the public is a chilling case study of
institutional arrogance, power and greed.  

I was drawn into the controversy only reluctantly.  As an attorney and
environmentalist who has spent years working on issues of mercury toxicity, I
frequently met mothers of autistic children who were absolutely convinced
that their kids had been injured by vaccines.  

Privately, I was skeptical.  I doubted that autism could be blamed on a single
source, and I certainly understood the government's need to reassure parents
that vaccinations are safe; the eradication of deadly childhood diseases
depends on it.  

I tended to agree with skeptics like Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat from
California, who criticized his colleagues on the
House Government Reform
Committee
for leaping to conclusions about autism and vaccinations.  

"Why should we scare people about immunization" Waxman pointed out at
one hearing,
"until we know the facts?"  

It was only after reading the Simpsonwood transcripts, studying the leading
scientific research on mercury that I became convinced that the link between
Thimerosal and the epidemic of childhood neurological disorders is real.  

Five of my own children are members of the
Thimerosal Generation -- those
born between 1989 and 2003 -- who received heavy doses of mercury from
vaccines.  

"The elementary grades are overwhelmed with children who have symptoms
of neurological or immune-system damage"
Patti White, a school nurse, told
the
House Government Reform Committee in 1999.  

"Vaccines are supposed to be making us healthier; however, in 25 years of
nursing I have never seen so many damaged, sick kids.  Something very, very
wrong is happening to our children."  

More than 500,000 kids currently suffer from autism, and pediatricians
diagnose more than 40,000 new cases every year.  

The disease was unknown until 1943, when it was identified and diagnosed
among 11 children born in the months after
Thimerosal was first added to
baby vaccines in 1931.  

Some skeptics dispute that the rise in autism is caused by
Thimerosal-tainted
vaccinations.  They argue that the increase is a result of better diagnosis -- a
theory that seems questionable at best, given that most of the new cases of
autism are clustered within a single generation of children.  

"If the epidemic is truly an artifact of poor diagnosis" scoffs Dr. Boyd Haley,
one of the world's authorities on mercury toxicity,
"then where are all the
20-year-old autistics?"  

Other researchers point out that Americans are exposed to a greater
cumulative
"load" of mercury than ever before, from contaminated fish to
dental fillings, and suggest that
Thimerosal in vaccines may be only part of a
much larger problem.  

It's a concern that certainly deserves far more attention than it has received --
but it overlooks the fact that the mercury concentrations in vaccines dwarf
other sources of exposure to our children.  

What is most striking is the lengths to which many of the leading detectives
have gone to ignore -- and cover up -- the evidence against
Thimerosal.  

From the very beginning, the scientific case against the mercury additive has
been overwhelming.  The preservative, which is used to stem fungi and
bacterial growth in vaccines, contains
ethylmercury, a potent neurotoxin.  

Truckloads of studies have shown that mercury tends to accumulate in the
brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines --
and that the developing brains of infants are particularly susceptible.  

In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to much lower
concentrations of
ethylmercury than those given to American children still
suffered brain damage years later.  

Russia banned
Thimerosal from children's vaccines 20 years ago, and
Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries
have since followed suit.  

"You couldn't even construct a study that shows Thimerosal is safe" says
Haley, who heads the chemistry department at the
University of Kentucky.  

"It's just too darn toxic.  If you inject Thimerosal into an animal, its brain will
sicken.  If you apply it to living tissue, the cells die.  If you put it in a petri dish,
the culture dies.  Knowing these things, it would be shocking if one could inject
it into an infant without causing damage."  

Internal documents reveal that Eli Lilly, which first developed Thimerosal,
knew from the start that its product could cause damage -- and even death --
in both animals and humans.  

In 1930, the company tested
Thimerosal by administering it to 22 patients with
terminal meningitis, all of whom died within weeks of being injected -- a fact
Lilly didn't bother to report in its study declaring Thimerosal safe.  

In 1935, researchers at another vaccine manufacturer,
Pittman-Moore, warned
Lilly that its claims about Thimerosal's safety "did not check with ours."  

Half the dogs Pittman injected with Thimerosal-based vaccines became sick,
leading researchers there to declare the preservative
"unsatisfactory as a
serum intended for use on dogs."
 

In the decades that followed, the evidence against
Thimerosal continued to
mount.  During the Second World War, when the
Department of Defense used
the preservative in vaccines on soldiers, it required
Lilly to label it "poison."  

In 1967, a study in Applied Microbiology found that Thimerosal killed mice
when added to injected vaccines.  

Four years later,
Lilly's own studies discerned that Thimerosal was "toxic to
tissue cells"
in concentrations as low as one part per million -- 100 times
weaker than the concentration in a typical vaccine.  

Even so, the company continued to promote
Thimerosal as "nontoxic" and
also incorporated it into topical disinfectants.  

In 1977, 10 babies at a Toronto hospital died when an antiseptic preserved
with
Thimerosal was dabbed onto their umbilical cords.  

In 1982, the FDA proposed a ban on over-the-counter products that contained
Thimerosal, and in 1991 the agency considered banning it from animal
vaccines.  

But tragically, that same year, the CDC recommended that infants be injected
with a series of mercury-laced vaccines.  

Newborns would be vaccinated for hepatitis B within 24 hours of birth, and
2-month-old infants would be immunized for haemophilus influenzae B and
diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis.  

The drug industry knew the additional vaccines posed a danger.  The same
year that the CDC approved the new vaccines, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of
the fathers of
Merck's vaccine programs, warned the company that
6-month-olds who were administered the shots would suffer dangerous
exposure to mercury.  

He recommended that
Thimerosal be discontinued, "especially when used on
infants and children"
noting that the industry knew of nontoxic alternatives.  

"The best way to go" he added, "is to switch to dispensing the actual vaccines
without adding preservatives."  

For Merck and other drug companies, however, the obstacle was money.  
Thimerosal
enables the pharmaceutical industry to package vaccines in vials
that contain multiple doses, which require additional protection because they
are more easily contaminated by multiple needle entries.  

The larger vials cost half as much to produce as smaller, single-dose vials,
making it cheaper for international agencies to distribute them to
impoverished regions at risk of epidemics.  

Faced with this
"cost consideration" Merck ignored Hilleman's warnings, and
government officials continued to push more and more
Thimerosal-based
vaccines for children.  

Before 1989, American preschoolers received 11 vaccinations -- for polio,
diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella.  

A decade later, thanks to federal recommendations, children were receiving a
total of 22 immunizations by the time they reached first grade.  

As the number of vaccines increased, the rate of autism among children
exploded.  During the 1990s, 40 million children were injected with
Thimerosal-based vaccines, receiving unprecedented levels of mercury
during a period critical for brain development.  

Despite the well-documented dangers of
Thimerosal, it appears that no one
bothered to add up the cumulative dose of mercury that children would
receive from the mandated vaccines.  

"What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?" Peter Patriarca, director
of viral products for the agency, asked in an email to the CDC in 1999.  

"Why didn't CDC and the advisory bodies do these calculations when they
rapidly expanded the childhood immunization schedule?"  

But by that time, the damage was done.  Infants who received all their
vaccines, plus boosters, by the age of six months were being injected with a
total of 187 micrograms of
ethylmercury -- a level 40 percent greater than the
EPA's limit for daily exposure to
methylmercury, a related neurotoxin.  

Although the vaccine industry insists that
ethylmercury poses little danger
because it breaks down rapidly and is removed by the body, several studies --
including one published in April by the
National Institutes of Health -- suggest
that ethylmercury is actually more toxic to developing brains and stays in the
brain longer than methylmercury.  

Under the expanded schedule of vaccinations, multiple shots were often
administered on a single day: At two months, when the infant brain is still at a
critical stage of development, children routinely received three inoculations
that delivered 99 times the approved limit of mercury.  

Officials responsible for childhood immunizations insist that the additional
vaccines were necessary to protect infants from disease and that
Thimerosal
is still essential in developing nations, which, they often claim, cannot afford
the single-dose vials that don't require a preservative.  

Dr. Paul Offit, one of CDC's top vaccine advisors, told me:
"I think if we really have an influenza pandemic -- and certainly we will in the
next 20 years, because we always do -- there's no way on God's earth that we
immunize 280 million people with single-dose vials.  There has to be multidose
vials."  

But while public-health officials may have been well intentioned, many of
those on the CDC advisory committee who backed the additional vaccines
had close ties to the industry.  

Dr. Sam Katz, the committee's chair, was a paid consultant for most of the
major vaccine makers and was part of a team that developed the measles
vaccine and brought it to licensure in 1963.  

Dr. Neal Halsey, another committee member, worked as a researcher for the
vaccine companies and received honoraria from
Abbott Labs for his research
on the hepatitis B vaccine.  

Indeed, in the tight circle of scientists who work on vaccines, such conflicts of
interest are common.  

Rep. Burton says that the CDC
"routinely allows scientists with blatant
conflicts of interest to serve on intellectual advisory committees that make
recommendations on new vaccines"
even though they have "interests in the
products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased
oversight."
 

The
House Government Reform Committee discovered that four of the eight
CDC advisors who approved guidelines for a rotavirus vaccine
"had financial
ties to the pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions
of the vaccine."  

Offit, who shares a patent on one of the vaccines, acknowledged to me that he
"would make money" if his vote eventually leads to a marketable product.  

But he dismissed my suggestion that a scientist's direct financial stake in
CDC approval might bias his judgment.  

"It provides no conflict for me" he insists. "I have simply been informed by the
process, not corrupted by it.  When I sat around that table, my sole intent was
trying to make recommendations that best benefited the children in this
country.  It's offensive to say that physicians and public-health people are in
the pocket of industry and thus are making decisions that they know are
unsafe for children.  It's just not the way it works."  

Other vaccine scientists and regulators gave me similar assurances.  Like
Offit, they view themselves as enlightened guardians of children's health,
proud of their
"partnerships" with pharmaceutical companies, immune to the
seductions of personal profit, besieged by irrational activists whose
anti-vaccine campaigns are endangering children's health.  They are often
resentful of questioning.
"Science" says Offit, "is best left to scientists."  

Still, some government officials were alarmed by the apparent conflicts of
interest.  In his email to CDC administrators in 1999, Paul Patriarca of the FDA
blasted federal regulators for failing to adequately scrutinize the danger
posed by the added baby vaccines.  

"I'm not sure there will be an easy way out of the potential perception that the
FDA, CDC and immunization-policy bodies may have been asleep at the switch
re: Thimerosal until now"
Patriarca wrote.  

The close ties between regulatory officials and the pharmaceutical industry,
he added,
"will also raise questions about various advisory bodies regarding
aggressive recommendations for use"
of Thimerosal in child vaccines.  

If federal regulators and government scientists failed to grasp the potential
risks of
Thimerosal over the years, no one could claim ignorance after the
secret meeting at Simpsonwood.  

But rather than conduct more studies to test the link to autism and other
forms of brain damage, the CDC placed politics over science.  

The agency turned its database on childhood vaccines -- which had been
developed largely at taxpayer expense -- over to a private agency,
America's
Health Insurance Plans
, ensuring that it could not be used for additional
research.  

It also instructed the
Institute of Medicine, an advisory organization that is part
of the
National Academy of Sciences, to produce a study debunking the link
between
Thimerosal and brain disorders.  

The CDC
"wants us to declare, well, that these things are pretty safe" Dr. Marie
McCormick, who chaired the IOM's
Immunization Safety Review Committee,
told her fellow researchers when they first met in January 2001.  

"We are not ever going to come down that [autism] is a true side effect" of
Thimerosal exposure.  According to transcripts of the meeting, the
committee's chief staffer, Kathleen Stratton, predicted that the IOM would
conclude that the evidence was
"inadequate to accept or reject a causal
relation"
between Thimerosal and autism.  That, she added, was the result
"Walt wants" -- a reference to Dr. Walter Orenstein, director of the National
Immunization Program
for the CDC.  

For those who had devoted their lives to promoting vaccination, the
revelations about
Thimerosal threatened to undermine everything they had
worked for.  

"We've got a dragon by the tail here" said Dr. Michael Kaback, another
committee member.  
"The more negative that [our] presentation is, the less
likely people are to use vaccination, immunization -- and we know what the
results of that will be.  We are kind of caught in a trap.  How we work our way
out of the trap, I think is the charge."  

Even in public, federal officials made it clear that their primary goal in studying
Thimerosal was to dispel doubts about vaccines.  

"Four current studies are taking place to rule out the proposed link between
autism and Thimerosal"
Dr. Gordon Douglas, then-director of strategic
planning for vaccine research at the
National Institutes of Health, assured a
Princeton University gathering in May 2001.  

"In order to undo the harmful effects of research claiming to link the measles
vaccine to an elevated risk of autism, we need to conduct and publicize
additional studies to assure parents of safety."  

Douglas formerly served as president of vaccinations for Merck, where he
ignored warnings about
Thimerosal's risks.  

In May of last year, the
Institute of Medicine issued its final report.  Its
conclusion: There is no proven link between autism and
Thimerosal in
vaccines.  

Rather than reviewing the large body of literature describing the toxicity of

Thimerosal
, the report relied on four disastrously flawed epidemiological
studies examining European countries, where children received much smaller
doses of
Thimerosal than American kids.  

It also cited a new version of the Verstraeten study, published in the journal
Pediatrics that had been reworked to reduce the link between
Thimerosal and
autism.  The new study included children too young to have been diagnosed
with autism and overlooked others who showed signs of the disease.  

The IOM declared the case closed and -- in a startling position for a scientific
body -- recommended that no further research be conducted.  

The report may have satisfied the CDC, but it convinced no one.  Rep. David
Weldon, a Republican physician from Florida who serves on the
House
Government Reform Committee
, attacked the Institute of Medicine, saying it
relied on a handful of studies that were
"fatally flawed" by "poor design" and
failed to represent
"all the available scientific and medical research."  

CDC officials are not interested in an honest search for the truth, Weldon told
me, because
"an association between vaccines and autism would force them
to admit that their policies irreparably damaged thousands of children.  Who
would want to make that conclusion about themselves?"  

Under pressure from Congress and parents, the Institute of Medicine
convened another panel to address continuing concerns about the
Vaccine
Safety Datalink
data-sharing program.  

In February, the new panel, composed of different scientists, criticized the
way the VSD had been used to study vaccine safety, and urged the CDC to
make its vaccine database available to the public.  

So far, though, only two scientists have managed to gain access.  Dr. Mark
Geier, president of the
Genetics Center of America, and his son, David, spent a
year battling to obtain the medical records from the CDC.  Since August 2002,
when members of Congress pressured the agency to turn over the data, the
Geiers have completed six studies that demonstrate a powerful correlation
between
Thimerosal and neurological damage in children.  

One study, which compares the cumulative dose of mercury received by
children born between 1981 and 1985 with those born between 1990 and
1996, found a
"very significant relationship" between autism and vaccines.  

Another study of educational performance found that kids who received
higher doses of
Thimerosal in vaccines were nearly three times as likely to be
diagnosed with autism and more than three times as likely to suffer from
speech disorders and mental retardation.  

Another soon-to-be-published study shows that autism rates are in decline
following the recent elimination of
Thimerosal from most vaccines.  

As the federal government worked to prevent scientists from studying
vaccines, others have stepped in to study the link to autism.  In April, reporter
Dan Olmsted of UPI undertook one of the more interesting studies himself.  

Searching for children who had not been exposed to mercury in vaccines --
the kind of population that scientists typically use as a
"control" in
experiments -- Olmsted scoured the Amish of Lancaster County, Penn., who
refuse to immunize their infants.  

Given the national rate of autism, Olmsted calculated that there should be 130
autistics among the Amish.  He found only four.  One had been exposed to
high levels of mercury from a power plant.  The other three -- including one
child adopted from outside the Amish community -- had received their
vaccines.  

At the state level, many officials have also conducted in-depth reviews of

Thimerosal
.  While the Institute of Medicine was busy whitewashing the risks,
the Iowa Legislature was carefully combing through all of the available
scientific and biological data.  

"After three years of review, I became convinced there was sufficient credible
research to show a link between mercury and the increased incidences in
autism"
state Sen. Ken Veenstra, a Republican who oversaw the
investigation, told the magazine
Byronchild earlier this year:

"The fact that Iowa's 700 percent increase in autism began in the 1990s, right
after more and more vaccines were added to the children's vaccine schedules,
is solid evidence alone."  

Last year, Iowa became the first state to ban mercury in vaccines, followed by
California.  Similar bans are now under consideration in 32 other states.  
But instead of following suit, the FDA continues to allow manufacturers to
include
Thimerosal in scores of over-the-counter medications as well as
steroids and injected collagen.  

Even more alarming, the government continues to ship vaccines preserved
with
Thimerosal to developing countries -- some of which are now
experiencing a sudden explosion in autism rates.  

In China, where the disease was virtually unknown prior to the introduction of
Thimerosal by U.S. drug manufacturers in 1999, news reports indicate that
there are now more than 1.8 million autistics.  

Although reliable numbers are hard to come by, autistic disorders also appear
to be soaring in India, Argentina, Nicaragua and other developing countries
that are now using
Thimerosal-laced vaccines.  

The
World Health Organization continues to insist Thimerosal is safe, but it
promises to keep the possibility that it is linked to neurological disorders
"under review."  

I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis
that must be addressed.  If, as the evidence suggests, our public-health
authorities knowingly allowed the pharmaceutical industry to poison an entire
generation of American children, their actions arguably constitute one of the
biggest scandals in the annals of American medicine.  

"The CDC is guilty of incompetence and gross negligence" says Mark Blaxill,
vice president of
Safe Minds, a nonprofit organization concerned about the
role of mercury in medicines.  

"The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive.  It's bigger than
asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you've ever seen."  

It's hard to calculate the damage to our country -- and to the international
efforts to eradicate epidemic diseases -- if Third World nations come to believe
that America's most heralded foreign-aid initiative is poisoning their children.  

It's not difficult to predict how this scenario will be interpreted by America's
enemies abroad.  The scientists and researchers -- many of them sincere,
even idealistic -- who are participating in efforts to hide the science on
Thimerosal claim that they are trying to advance the lofty goal of protecting
children in developing nations from disease pandemics.  

They are badly misguided.  Their failure to come clean on
Thimerosal will
come back horribly to haunt our country and the world's poorest populations.
 

By: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. www.robertfkennedyjr.com

Article: Vaccinations Deadly Immunity
http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/articles/2005_june_16.html